Back to Blog
Total war warhammer norsca tech tree5/3/2023 I know they have more unique stuff, but I could go with them having unique Lords, Runelords, Thanes and Runesmiths who act and fight differently. Like as you said, Norse warriors (or in this case untainted ones), units that use stuff like spears, Norse Dwarf Berserkers which would be anti-everything Slayers, and two types of War Mammoths (one normal and one with a Bolt-Thrower Tower). Shard Dragons, along with Rune Guardians and Rune Golems, should be a general thing for Dwarfs in limited numbers and linked via the Smithy build-tree (and Engineering for the Rune Guardians).īut in case of Norse Dwarfs they should get more than this. They'd have to have access to some (slightly reskinned) Norsca units and somehow limited access to higher tech (anything involving steam, flame and gunpowder).Īgree, base dwarfs without gunpowder, some norse marauders (they'd need new voicelines too, no exaltations of the chaos gods, please), add a few monsters like mammoths and ice wolves (dare I mention the shard dragon?) and you have a fun, but simple to make, roster. Honestly, Norse Dwarfs could be done as an Arkhan style LP/FLC faction. In a sense it could be a bit like with the Chaos Dwarfs, not that many regular dwarfs to go around, but you can complete your roster with mercenaries that might act as chaff, but would be better than greenskins maybe. I'd say Norse Dwarfs with a really well developed mercenary mechanic among others to show how they hire humans in the lore. If spine of Sotek dwarfs became canon, then incan dwarfs would be a interesting thing. I would like a proper third dwarfen faction. Just like elves, dwarfs have split into three groups:īoring dwarfs, chaos dwarfs and yesyes dwarfsĪnd people out there asking for norse dwarfs to get that parallelism, when it has been there from the start. so get the book out and write ugleir thagorki Well even if it's just a legend it's enough to **** the Dwarfs right off which makes me think they think it's true.Ĭonfirmation or not this means ehm ridicule to all dwarfs. GW often likes having multiple points of view/in universe explanations for the same phenomena. It’s still not an official confirmation at least. Some dwarfs might believe that, but other might not. So even in universe Thurin is calling it a legend, not so much a confirmation that’s really the case. "Thurin Strongblade, Runescribe of Karak Alnor" We fight them not just to settle our grudges, but to shed our shame.” And this is why the Dwarfs fight the Skaven as hard as we fight the Greenskins, though the Ratmen have wreaked far less damage upon us: because many of us believe that the Skaven came from our blood. He was rightly exiled for this, so he went away into the deep-earth and learnt how to shape his flesh instead of shaping metal, turning himself into a hideous rat-beast and swearing revenge on his blood-kin. Skavor, like Gazul, was younger than his brothers and lacked the skill for working stone or shaping metal. “There’s a legend that the Skaven are all descended from Skavor, the son of Gazul, cousin to Grimnir. Would you be willing to post the page number of said passage? Nah there is passage in horned rat confirming this notion Probably a detail that won’t truly ever be unveiled to preserve the mystery. It’s also possible that Skavor exists as an Ancestor God but wasn’t responsible for creating the Skaven.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |